Menu Secondary

Aidwa
AIDWA
  • About AIDWA
  • Events
  • What we do
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • NewsLetters
  • Press Releases
search
menu
  • About Aidwa
  • Events
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Magazines
  • Resources
  • Reports
  • Publications
  • Posters
  • What We Do
  • Food and Health
  • Women and Work
  • Gender Violence
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Communalism
  • Legal Intervention
  • Media Portrayal
About us
Contact us
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu

Women Protest Outside Supreme Court Against Dilution Of Section 498A

Mariam Dhawale
08 Aug 2017
Women’s anger erupted on July 31 at the gates of the Supreme Court of India against its recent judgement that would lead to the dilution of Section 498A. Several representatives of women's organisations assembled outside the Supreme Court to protest against the recent order of the Supreme Court on Section 498A and demanded its review. The demonstration was held within just three days of the Supreme Court order. 
Women Protest Outside Supreme Court Against  Dilution Of Section 498A
Women Protest Outside Supreme Court Against Dilution Of Section 498A

Women’s anger erupted on July 31 at the gates of the Supreme Court of India against its recent judgement that would lead to the dilution of Section 498A. Several representatives of women's organisations assembled outside the Supreme Court to protest against the recent order of the Supreme Court on Section 498A and demanded its review. The demonstration was held within just three days of the Supreme Court order. 

Women's organisations have expressed serious reservations to this order because it is made on the presumption that a large number of cases filed under Section 498A are false. This is factually incorrect and has been proved so by many studies. Women expressed great consternation at being branded as liars. This judgement is seeking to create parallel systems of justice by ordering the setting up of family welfare centres. It is underestimating the seriousness of the issue of violence against women.

Such suggestions in the judgement would result in diluting Section 498A, making it totally ineffective. It is unfortunate that this judgement comes at a time when crimes against women are on the rise. Women face tremendous violence in their daily lives. Most of the time women who are victims of violence find it difficult to register their complaints at the police stations. They are subjected to insulting questions and humiliating behavior. Many a times they are forced to reconcile and return back to a violent atmosphere. The conviction rates are very low due to poor police investigation. Setting up family welfare centres will make it more difficult for women to get justice and protection from violent husbands and/or relatives.

The refrain of the protest was that a battered woman demands that 498A be strengthened, not diluted; that women are not liars; they seek legal redress only after exhausting all options for reconciliation; that the Hon'ble Court must not buckle under the pressure of patriarchal forces who are raising their pitch in the current political climate that suits them. It is ttempts have been made by various reactionary forces for the last one decade to dilute this section. 

In addition to this, women are also appalled at the directive issued by the Minister of Women and Child Development, Maneka Gandhi to the National Commission for Women (NCW) to "provide a window to 'aggrieved' men against whom complaints have been made”. This is clearly against the purpose and spirit for which the NCW has been constituted. Women raised slogans asking the woman minister to ‘prevent cruelty against women’.
    
The women tried to seek an audience with the Hon'ble Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. A copy of the memorandum has been submitted and the appointment is awaited.

Women's organisations will conduct a signature campaign all over the country demanding the strengthening of section 498A and withdrawal of the directive of the MWCD to the NCW.

The organisations which participated in this protest were All India Democratic Women’s Association, All India Women’s Conference, CBCI Council for Women, Centre for Struggling Women, Guild of Service, Jagori, Joint Women’s Programme, Lawyer’s Collective, Leprosy Mission, Nari Shakti Manch, National Federation of Indian Women, Pragatisheel Mahila Sanghatan, Swastik Mahila Samiti and Young Women’s Christian Association. 

The AIDWA was represented in this demonstration by Adv Kirti Singh, Mariam Dhawale, Asha Sharma, Maimoona Mollah, Reeja Jayaprasad, Sonia Verma, Sarbani and others. 
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

 

Section 498A

More Stories

  • Mariam Dhawale
    AIDWA Supports September 27 Bharat Bandh Call
    01 Sep 2021
    This is a struggle of all Indians to unitedly reclaim India from the clutches of the Modi-Shah-Ambani-Adani unholy nexus! We shall Fight! We shall Win!
  • Uttar Pradesh Population Control Bill
    Dr. Arathi Presenna Madhavan
    What are the Social Implications of the Uttar Pradesh Population Control Bill?
    31 Aug 2021
    Studies on the success of India’s southern states in containing population growth indicate that economic growth as well as attention to education, health and empowerment of women work far better as…
  • Surangya
    Cubans recognize the enemy: Understanding the protests in Cuba
    31 Aug 2021
    The main culprit, however, is the crippling economic blockade imposed by the US which restricts sharply the Cuban government’s power to purchase the basic necessities that the protestors were…
  • Shamsia Hassani
    Women in Afghanistan Today
    31 Aug 2021
    These artworks by Shamsia Hassani, possibly the first and the only woman street artist in Afghanistan, and also a fine arts lecturer and associate professor in Kabul University, articulate the fear…
  • Access to smartphones during lockdown
    Indian Researcher
    What Happened to Access to Digital Education during Lockdown?
    31 Aug 2021
    More than 38 per cent of school-going children had no access to smart-phones in rural India. This divide is further pronounced by the type of school management.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us