Menu Secondary

Aidwa
AIDWA
  • About AIDWA
  • Events
  • What we do
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • NewsLetters
  • Press Releases
search
menu
  • About Aidwa
  • Events
  • Inspiring Stories
  • Magazines
  • Resources
  • Reports
  • Publications
  • Posters
  • What We Do
  • Food and Health
  • Women and Work
  • Gender Violence
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Communalism
  • Legal Intervention
  • Media Portrayal
About us
Contact us
Follow us Facebook - Newsclick Twitter - Newsclick RSS - Newsclick
close menu

On SC Verdict on Two-Child Norm

10 Aug 2003
THE Supreme Court judgement upholding the two-child norm for contesting panchayat elections is in contradiction to the Cairo declaration, to which India is a signatory, and to the National Population Policy charter that eschews coercive methods in population control.
THE Supreme Court judgement upholding the two-child norm for contesting panchayat elections is in contradiction to the Cairo declaration, to which India is a signatory, and to the National Population Policy charter that eschews coercive methods in population control. By giving its stamp of approval on laws of some state governments that are highly discriminatory in nature, it justifies the extension of economic and social inequality to democratic process, creating an underclass that is deprived of the basic right to participate in elected decision making bodies.
 
There can be no quarrel with the court's rejection of the preposterous plea made by some complainants that since they had the right to four wives the two-child norm could not be applied to them.
 
However, the reasoning given by the court goes far beyond this objectionable plea, since it justifies disincentives to control family size as being "in the national interest." The court's perception of the 'national interest' ignores the interests of the majority who make up the nation. Global experience, as also the experience of our own country, shows that family size is linked to factors like control of infant mortality, poverty eradication, literacy, access to safe contraception and so on. When these issues are tackled, as is the example of Kerala, then couples opt for a smaller family. In the absence of such measures, a regime of disincentives is actually punishing the poor for their poverty. The Supreme Court judgement has wider implications that are a throwback to the logic of Emergency days when coercive methods of sterilization were justified as being in the 'national interest.' It gives sanction to and opens the floodgate for cruel strategies employed by many state governments of depriving poor families who have more than two children, of government benefits including ration cards, government jobs and so on.
 
In a country where there is a skewed sex ratio based on cultures of son-preference, a two-child norm will lead to further distortions. In many cases women have little choice over family size and therefore are being punished for factors beyond their control.
 
We oppose the judgement of the Supreme Court. We demand that parliament reassert the basic premise of the Cairo declaration and the National Population Policy against coercion, disincentives and targets.

More Stories

  •  Chityala Ailamma
    Chityala Ailamma
    14 Sep 2017
     Chityala Ailamma (1919-1985) was a participant in the Telangana peasant armed struggle. She revolted against the feudal landlord Visunoori Ramchandra Reddy to protect her 4 acres of land, which she…
  • Aruna Asaf Ali
    Aruna Asaf Ali
    14 Sep 2017
    Recipient of the Lenin Prize for Peace and the Bharat Ratna, Aruna Asaf Ali was Delhi’s first Mayor. Born in 1909 in Kalka (now Haryana) in an orthodox Hindu Bengali family, she was educated in…
  • Amiya Dutta
    13 Sep 2017
    Amiya Dutta came from a poor family in Bikrampur in Dhaka district (now Bangladesh). Was married off while still in her early teens. Amiya was deeply influenced by the underground activities of…
  • Ahilya Rangnekar
    08 Sep 2017
    Ahilya came from a family influenced by the values of the social reform and all the four daughters and daughter-in-law completed their graduation. On 8th August 1942, in response to the declaration…
  • Lakshmi Sehgal
    Lakshmi Sehgal
    08 Sep 2017
      Born in 1914 to S. Swaminadhan, lawyer and A.V Ammukutty, social worker and freedom fighter, Lakshmi was involved in the freedom struggle from an early age. she campaigned for temple entry for…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us